a review of " iCon Steve Jobs: The Greatest Second Act in the History of Business " i was about 50 pages into the book. i could not take anymore of praise for Steve Jobs. it also made me feel so small that i stopped reading the book and worked 14 hours everyday for 3 weeks at my office. it took me a while for me to come out of the "you are nothing" feeling. soon, i started reading the book with fresh enthusiasm, just for the pleasure of reading. within the next few pages, the tone of the book changed dramatically. in history, if there was one biography that points out all the mistakes of the person being biographed and the flaws in his very personality, this is it. its a blasphemy of biographies!!!! may be that's all there is to it. but wait. the biographers covered the length and breadth of Steve's temper and how it reflected in every action of his. as a biography, it neatly portrays his ups and downs in both professional and personal life. how did the a...
I could not understand why historians have to compare Tagore and Gandhi. When I first read Gandhiji's works and literature on Gandhi, I instantly admired him and became a keen observer of some of his principles like ahimsa and simplicity. When I started reading Tagore's works, I instantly fell in love with him !!!! I was prompted to consume volumes of literature about Tagore. I had this compulsion to know every aspect of Tagore. I tried to read every piece of work and words that were ever told and written about him. He appeared to be the ideal person who was all that vedanta could convey. Indeed, I was stunned that he was the first person to be of that characteristics to have gained a place in both international arena and common man's hearts (apart from personalities who were branded as proper Saints like Swami Ramakrishna Paramahamsa , Swami Vivekananda, etc). Gandhi was a great political leader, helping the masses decide what is good for the country as a whole and how ...
It is quite a shocking news to hear Tamil poet Vairamuthu mention Andal's Devadasi reference from a book, which was a totally unknown resource until referred by Vairamuthu. It is shocking because it comes from Vairamuthu, a litarati, atleast until this mention. Would you go to a gathering of believers and talk non-sense about their beliefs? He should have the basic common-sense to study the place and situation and address the gathering wisely. The news portal Dinamani is not his personal blog. Further more, what is the need to refer Andal from a Muslim author's book? Especially, when the content is questionable whether it is praising or derogatory. Vairamuthu does not even seem to have done a research on the validity of his source of reference. A very glaring mistake indeed for a public speech and essay. This is the book referred by Vairamuthu in his essay on Andal: https://books.google.com/books?id=LurSAAAAMAAJ&q=Indian+Movements:+Some+Aspects+of+Dissent+Protest+a...
Comments
Post a Comment